I think people had been debating Spider-Woman/Jessica Drew a lot, and I guess Kingpin still counts as far Spidey rights go.
Now if only we could actually get Spidey vs Kingpin .
I think people had been debating Spider-Woman/Jessica Drew a lot, and I guess Kingpin still counts as far Spidey rights go.
Pretty ironic coming a money grubbing parasite still stamping his name on things who ruined the other 2 Spider-Man movie franchises.Avi Arad blast Sony deal with Marvel Studios:
Spider-Man Producer Avi Arad Blasts Sony's Marvel Studios Deal
Longtime Spider-Man producer Avi Arad slams the deal between Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios, which helped bring the Web-Slinger into the MCU.www.cbr.com
Because it worked so well the first time for them.Now they're kinda touting a Venom vs Spider-man film. This is smart on Sony. Similar to what Rock is doing with BA vs. SHAZAM. Letting fandom build up hype.
Sent from my LM-Q730 using Tapatalk
I don't know if you want this thread to go further off topic. I have more evidence Johnson is game.Because it worked so well the first time for them.
Actually Rock is doing BA vs. Superman, he wants nothing to do with Shazam.
[Okay], Got it.I think you know my answer is "nope," lol. Feel free to post it in the DC Universe movie thread.
A new rumor claims Marvel Studios was planning to build towards a black suit storyline but Sony starting a Venom trilogy torpedoed the plan. So this 4th movie won't feature it at all and the storyline is being saved for a future movie further down the line.
Clickbait and a pointless video unless I forgot Hawke or Scorsese were on the set of every MCU movie filmed, invisible, and observed every second of the director and their interactions with Marvel Studios for them to make the statements they have in the past that this guy is rehashing.Ethan Hawke gives some bts insight (as much as he is allowed) into how Marvel works with talent:
Or they could just skip all over that .The problem with that means it would be skipping over a massive aspect of his character arc from having a happy jokey personality to becoming the old tired and disgruntled version we have seen during the Krakoa era.
Clickbait and a pointless video unless I forgot Hawke or Scorsese were on the set of every MCU movie filmed, invisible, and observed every second of the director and their interactions with Marvel Studios for them to make the statements they have in the past that this guy is rehashing.
Or they could just skip all over that .
I hope they can do more with Gamora. I think Gunn sold her short in the first two Guardians movies compared to her comics counterpart.
Yeah, I wouldn't object to solo outings for a lot of the Guardians, including Gamora. I wouldn't go as far to say they suffered because their characters were stuck in the orbit of Star-Lord but there are glimpses of interesting stories. Like for Gamora, she's a variant essentially living out the original's life. So there's a lot of disgruntled folk and enemies the original made that the variant never did and would have to deal with eventually.I hope they can do more with Gamora. I think Gunn sold her short in the first two Guardians movies compared to her comics counterpart.
I think also just that Gamora is supposed to be the "most dangerous woman in the galaxy" and the movies...never really showed that .Yeah, I wouldn't object to solo outings for a lot of the Guardians, including Gamora. I wouldn't go as far to say they suffered because their characters were stuck in the orbit of Star-Lord but there are glimpses of interesting stories. Like for Gamora, she's a variant essentially living out the original's life. So there's a lot of disgruntled folk and enemies the original made that the variant never did and would have to deal with eventually.
Well, in Vol 2, she did look pretty dangerous when she fought Nebula and had that huge cannon on her shoulder...I think also just that Gamora is supposed to be the "most dangerous woman in the galaxy" and the movies...never really showed that .