DBTrilogy100
Well-Known Member
I really wanted to avoid bogging the thread down over minute details as that's not the point of this thread and, as you said, there are more important things to talk about here but it seems clarifications need to be made.I don't want to harp on this too long as there are obviously more important things to talk about here, but I did want to point this out real quick
1. Switching the villains in the Android Saga was not actually something Toriyama improvised but rather was something more forced on him by the editor at the time. See the plan WAS for 19 and 20 to be the original androids/cyborgs and be the main villain but the editor didn't really like the designs and felt they were a let down from what Trunks talked about. Thus 17/18/16 being thought of and the editor going "so what now they're just punk kids? There has to be something better then that" thus why Cell became the main villain and a lot of his looks more rushed through then planned out. Like honestly you can sort of see traces of that looking at the story from farther away but honestly it does flow rather seamlessly for the most part and work as a whole.
2. The Whole Potara earring fusion though created to not use Gogeta before movie 12, was thought of more in the first place because Toriyama's original idea of ending the series with Gohan as the hero didn't pan out. And unlike the Cell Saga this wasn't an editor's thing because Toriyama WANTED to end the series originally with the Cell arc and was only convinced to do another arc if he was allowed to do whatever he wanted without ANY editor's notes which was agreed upon. So yeah all the choices there were on him which did include various whims and ideas him not really liking and shifting... last minute which yeah unlike the Cell Saga, makes the Buu Arc's later half feel pretty contrived and poorly plotted at points as it was Toriyama not liking one direction so having to turn a corner... but that other corner not having anything in it so him desperately digging through some sort of pipe to go a new way and us having to deal with some of the sewage as a result.
The first point feels like an argument of semantics/splitting hairs over terminology as I feel we're ultimately saying the same general point. My use of saying Akira Toriyama "improvised the villains of the Android Saga" was to quickly get across the point that "Android 16-18 & Cell (along with his multiple transformations) weren't initially planned" without getting bogged down over the specific details. It's true that this improvising was influenced by editor influence but I wouldn't say that means it's not an example of improvising compared to if he had come up with the switching villains on his own whims; I would simply consider it an example of improvising inspired by outside factors.
It's, indeed, true that Gohan was initially planned to be the main character of the Buu Saga before Akira Toriyama (of his own accord) decided against it in the end. Once again, my focusing on the "Gogeta being in DBZ Movie 12 inspired Akira Toriyama to come up with Vegito/the Potara Earring Fusion" part of the scenario was for the sake of quickly getting the point across without getting bogged down over the specific details. With regards to the notion that Akira Toriyama wanted to end the series with the Cell Saga, the notion that Akira Toriyama wanted to end the series at specific points (whether it be pre-DBZ, the Frieza Saga or the Cell Saga among others) only to be persuaded to continue on is more hazy/not as clear-cut as some might realize. The link here provides a thorough look into the urban legends surrounding the "intended endings" of the series for anyone who wishes to learn more about it because, once again, I really want to avoid bogging the thread down over minute details.
I trust that this clarifies any potential misunderstandings and really hope the matter can rest at that now since I really would rather not bog the thread down any more than it already has as that's not the point of this thread.