Is this a prank? That looks like the Nostalgia Chick....
It was a YouTube video made back in like November, about the Disney princesses telling Leia in song what a Disney Princess should act like.I dunno. It could be a joke but I'm sure it's not far off anyway.
The only reason why Mulan is a Disney Princess is because her movie was popular with the target audience of girls. That's how you're a part of the lineup. For example, if Black Cauldron was successful, then Princess Elionwy wold be in the toy-line. Also, technically Cinderella and Belle are duchesses, since they aren't royal blood and married into royalty, so having them marketed as Disney Princesses also makes no sense.Also....why in the world has Mulan been considered a Disney Princess? She is not from royalty and never marries into royalty...........I'm confused.
Meaning you're fine with Rapunzel?Honestly I don't think any character outside of the traditional Disney Animation Studio should ever be considered a "Disney Princess", that goes for Pixar films too.
When I first saw this thread I was imagining an animated Leia with Cinderella and Snow White and all of them on a lunchbox or something.
Meaning you're fine with Rapunzel?
Well, it looks like at least The Muppets are safe.Sure. I'm fine with that. It may have been CGI but it was a traditional Disney fairytale loosely based on an existing story and in musical form. Even the stylization was supposed to look like a 3D rendering of the 2D films from the renaissance. So I'm fine if they really want to market it as a member of that group.
Where as Brave had very little in common. The style was nothing like classic disney, it was made by Pixar, and it was an original story not based on a fairy tale (or a-skewed history). In fact when they tried to integrate the main character in, they made so many alterations to the style (to make it fit with the other "princesses") that it actually upset some people.
So......yeah. I just don't want to one day have to see that image of the classic disney girls with Mirada, Leia, and Princess Python (Marvel character) all running around together. Something about that just seems......wrong.
The only reason why Mulan is a Disney Princess is because her movie was popular with the target audience of girls. That's how you're a part of the lineup. For example, if Black Cauldron was successful, then Princess Elionwy wold be in the toy-line. Also, technically Cinderella and Belle are duchesses, since they aren't royal blood and married into royalty, so having them marketed as Disney Princesses also makes no sense.
Actually I think that is the most likely case.Another theory for Mulan: They wanted ethnical diversity.
Do the now owned by Disney girls of Marvel Comics (Spider Woman, Invisible Woman, Scarlett Witch, Black Widow, Black Cat, others) count as Disney Princesses?