- Joined
- May 13, 2003
- Messages
- 42,377
It's arguable that Family Guy is actually MORE popular in the UK than the U.S., but admittedly I don't have the numbers to back that up.
I recall that contractual obligations re: Adult Swim's syndication rights to the show caused the DVDs of Futurama (and maybe also Family Guy) to be released in the UK before their release in the US.Yes, the UK (England)
And even Rugrats had an unusual history: it was initially canceled a few seasons in, and then the unexpected success of reruns lead to it being revived only a few years later.Huh I'm really surprised Spongebob Squarepants hasn't been brought up yet. Then again I suppose there are some members of this board who may not have even been born when SB premiered but yeah when I first saw it as a teen I figured it would be at most 2-3 possibly 4 season show and last like a few years. Seemed like in 2000 the only super long last Nicktoon was Rugrats and with about to get this big push for it's 10th anniversary that was seen as the fluke and nothing else would really come close
I think the Simpsons is arguably more popular outside the US than it is in the US. A lot of it's fanbase is either in Europe or Latin America.It's arguable that Family Guy is actually MORE popular in the UK than the U.S., but admittedly I don't have the numbers to back that up.
And even Rugrats had an unusual history: it was initially canceled a few seasons in, and then the unexpected success of reruns lead to it being revived only a few years later.
Same difference as to whether it was "cancelled" or just initially ended in a way that was maybe premature in hindsight, I guess? I hope my larger points still stand.I don't think it was necessarily cancelled originally; Nickelodeon had a deal with all of the original Nicktoons to produce a certain amount of episodes for their runs that would then constantly reair on the network. The idea was the one that wound up being most popular in ratings would continue on but that believe it or not was originally promised to Doug the Nicktoon that originally tested well when first premiered but yeah then Ren and Stimpy became the break out when the shows actually started going but due to John K's various issues ren and Stimpy quickly burnt out it's popularity and by the time all the shows ended their production run Rugrats did best in reruns thus why it continued on far longer then the other original NIcktoons.
You did have to be there, or at least, you had to be there when the original 65 episodes were all that existed. They're pretty funny and clever. When the show came back it was never the same.Rugrats - This cartoon is literally just babies doing baby stuff. I don't hate it, but I also don't see any of the appeal. I guess it's just one of those "you had to be there to understand it" situations and I am too young (1997 born) to see the appeal it had for 90s kids.
I recall that contractual obligations re: Adult Swim's syndication rights to the show caused the DVDs of Futurama (and maybe also Family Guy) to be released in the UK before their release in the US.
Huh I'm really surprised Spongebob Squarepants hasn't been brought up yet.
I am shocked to learn that Smurfs had nine seasons.
No, adult programs are subtitled here.Did you have to watch a dub? Honestly, I could never picture watching this show with different voice actors than the Americans. Nothing would translate or work. There is some great comic timing and observational humor with the American cast that would not play with a dub.
Interesting. Thanks for this.No, adult programs are subtitled here.
Heck, at its peak the show was on for a 90 minute block with 39 episodes a season. Putting this into perspective, this was back when if a Saturday Morning cartoon was lucky enough to get a second season, it got just eight episodes. And then there was Smurfs.I am shocked to learn that Smurfs had nine seasons.
Same difference as to whether it was "cancelled" or just initially ended in a way that was maybe premature in hindsight, I guess? I hope my larger points still stand.
I'm not surprised Spongebob has had longevity; I remember fairly early on people identifying the character as having a classic Bugs Bunny-type appeal, in contrast to a lot of other (then) recent characters. I probably didn't expect the original series to last over 20 years, have three movies over a span of 16 years and two spin-offs, but that just didn't happen then.
It's kind of odd that of all of Hanna Barbera's shows, Scooby Doo is the one that's been the most popular and is still getting new shows. No other HB show has had this longevity.
There are some things about it that are dated (The slow pacing, and the psychobabble boomer stereotypes. But that's the case with most slice of life shows, this even applies to The Simpsons), which the reboot does remedy. But most of the show is pretty timeless. You go into the show thinking it's going to be simple and monotonous, its true allure lies in its subversive humor, quirky characters, unconventional animation, handling of themes such as friendship and family, refusal to condescend to its audience, and it's adept handling of mature subjects (I Remember Melville) with finesse and sophistication.Rugrats - This cartoon is literally just babies doing baby stuff. I don't hate it, but I also don't see any of the appeal. I guess it's just one of those "you had to be there to understand it" situations and I am too young (1997 born) to see the appeal it had for 90s kids.
Family Guy - It doesn't help that I have never in my life met a fan. Unlike The Simpsons and South Park, I think this is something that only Americans find funny.
I also agree with Phineas & Ferb.
Phineas and Ferb and Big City Greens. They both were cute enough shows, but I never thought they'd be strong or popular enough to get life past Disney Channel's standard "two season and done" rule.
Except for Tom & Jerry and (arguably) The Flintstones. Yes, the former was originally produced by MGM studios, but Bill Hanna and Joe Barbera created T&J before leaving to start their own studio and got the rights to the characters from MGM in 1975, so T&J are technically H-B characters. In the case if the latter, while things fell off for franchise after the 1980s, The Flintstones had a number of spinoff series after the original series ended (The Pebbles and Bamm-Bamm Show, The Flintstone Comedy Hour/Show, The All-New Fred and Barney Show, Fred and Barney Meet the Thing/Shmoo, The Flintstone Comedy Show, The Flintstone Kids, Cave Kids).It's kind of odd that of all of Hanna Barbera's shows, Scooby Doo is the one that's been the most popular and is still getting new shows. No other HB show has had this longevity.
There are some things about it (Rugrats) that are dated (The slow pacing, and the psychobabble boomer stereotypes. But that's the case with most slice of life shows, this even applies to The Simpsons), which the reboot does remedy. But most of the show is pretty timeless. You go into the show thinking it's going to be simple and monotonous, its true allure lies in its subversive humor, quirky characters, unconventional animation, handling of themes such as friendship and family, refusal to condescend to its audience, and it's adept handling of mature subjects (I Remember Melville) with finesse and sophistication.
I elucidated that its subversive humor, peculiar yet captivating animation style, treatment of certain themes, the show's evolution and coherence, and its intelligent approach to writing all contributed to its status as a program ahead of its time – akin to a more family-friendly rendition of The Simpsons. It strikes a balance, managing to be appropriate for adults without being excessively cute or saccharine, despite the initial impression its premise might convey. Paul Germain and his writing team aimed to create a series with writing comparable to Taxi but tailored for a younger audience.Except for Tom & Jerry and (arguably) The Flintstones. Yes, the former was originally produced by MGM studios, but Bill Hanna and Joe Barbera created T&J before leaving to start their own studio and got the rights to the characters from MGM in 1975, so T&J are technically H-B characters. In the case if the latter, while things fell off for franchise after the 1980s, The Flintstones had a number of spinoff series after the original series ended (The Pebbles and Bamm-Bamm Show, The Flintstone Comedy Hour/Show, The All-New Fred and Barney Show, Fred and Barney Meet the Thing/Shmoo, The Flintstone Comedy Show, The Flintstone Kids, Cave Kids).
Rugrats was simple and monotonous. I kid, but the immense popularity of Rugrats baffles me to this very day. I never understood why this show struck such a chord with kids and adults and how this show got 3 movies and a revival after its initial cancellation when there were other Nicktoons like Rocko's Modern Life that were far more deserving. I get why SpongeBob was/is popular (although I didn't expect it to still be going 2 decades later), but Rugrats, I swear someone must've made a deal with some supernatural entity for Rugrats to become Nick's #1 show.
And don't forget some cartoons adaptation of various live-action stuffs like The Dukes, Rambo, Mr. T, Chuck Norris, Police Academy, Teen Wolf, Punky Brewster, Real Ghostbusters.It's no wonder every cartoon from 1982 through 1986 was called "The Somethings" and was about a bunch of creatures with specific personality types.
I really dont like this way of thinking. I know dubs in the USA are bad and thus have a terrible reputation but in regions like Latin America and so on, where dubbing is great and many shows are famous for having great dubs, that's not a problem at all. Most people consume dubbing so naturally they dont even ever mind it.Did you have to watch a dub? Honestly, I could never picture watching this show with different voice actors than the Americans. Nothing would translate or work. There is some great comic timing and observational humor with the American cast that would not play with a dub.